[vpnc-devel] In-kernel IPSEC support

John Morrissey jwm at horde.net
Sat Feb 2 22:50:28 CET 2008


On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 01:42:28PM -0500, Jeremy Volkman wrote:
> I believe the patch you're referring to posted at
> http://lists.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/pipermail/vpnc-devel/2004-September/000228.html.
>  It's about 3.5 years old and won't apply cleanly anymore, but I hope
> to spend some time fixing that in the near future. In the meantime,
> have you tried one of the various NAT-T modes (e.g. force-natt or
> cisco-udp)?

cisco-udp didn't work since ike must (apparently) still be sourced from port
500 on the client (at least, it didn't work for me when I tried using 501
for the local port instead - the tunnel would be established, but wouldn't
pass any traffic).

Using local port 501 with force-natt works great, though. Thanks, Jeremy.

john
-- 
John Morrissey          _o            /\         ----  __o
jwm at horde.net        _-< \_          /  \       ----  <  \,
www.horde.net/    __(_)/_(_)________/    \_______(_) /_(_)__


More information about the vpnc-devel mailing list